Tomato Business Integration Conduct; Is It the Impact of Marketing Structure? (Tomato Marketing Study in Manggarai Regency, East Nusa Tenggara)


  • Fabianus Gangkur Brawijaya University
  • Ratya Anindita Faculty of Agriculture, Brawijaya University
  • Hery Toiba Faculty of Agriculture, Brawijaya University



business integration, conduct, performance, tomato


This study aimed to examine the demand for tomato SCP in Manggarai Regency. The participants were 82 farmers, 7 middlemen, and 16 retailers. The characteristics of the farmers were homogeneous in terms of having a limited area of approximately 0.1-0.5 hectares. A simple random sampling method was then used to determine the participants. Slovin’s formula was used to determine the farmer participants. The snowball sampling method was used to assess the sample of middlemen. Market structure data was analyzed by market share, and market concentration used CR4 estimates. Whereas, consumer conduct had been descriptively studied in relation to pricing strategies and business integration. Market performance estimation was made by measuring the margin and the farmer’s share. The results showed that the structure of the market for tomatoes in Manggarai Regency was oligopolistic and very concentrated. The CR4 values were as follows: middlemen (69.95 %), retailers (54.57%) and farmers (13.05 per cent). Meanwhile, the market structure affected the market conduct in which traders as price determinant and farmers as price takers. In addition, the middlemen established vertical business integration as an attempt to expand their business, dominate the market and increase their income. Oligopoly market structure and market conduct affected the tomato market in Manggarai Regency. The tomato market performance was inefficient as seen from a wide margin but having small farmer’s share. The margin values for channels I and II were Rp12.151,00 and Rp11.525,00 respectively. Whereas the farmer’s share was 36.46 percent and 39.74 percent respectively. Reflecting to the results, an accessible price information service is extremely needed for farmers to minimize asymmetry information. In addition, farmers need to maximize the role and work of farmers' groups as a joint marketing agency in order to increase their bargaining position.

Author Biography

Fabianus Gangkur, Brawijaya University

Agribusiness Programm Study, Agriculture Faculty


Anggraeni, Melisa Dinda, and Nur Baladina. 2017. “Analisis Struktur, Perilaku Dan Penampilan Pasar Kentang Di Desa Sumberbrantas, Kec. BumiAji, Kota Batu.†Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis I(2).

Anindita, Ratya, and Nur Baladina. 2017. Pemasaran Produk Pertanian. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Arsyad, Lincolin, and Stephanus Eri Kusuma. 2014. Ekonomika Industri: Pendekatan Struktur, Perilaku Dan Kinerja. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Baladina, Nur. 2012. “Analisis Struktur, Perilaku, Dan Penampilan Pasar Wortel Di Sub Terminal Agribisnis(STA) Mantung (Kasus Pada Sentra Produksi Wortel Di Desa Tawangsari, Kecamatan Pujon, Kabupaten Malang).†AGRISE XII(2):1412–25.

Chogou, Sylvain Kpenavoun, Roxène Assogba, Hervé Degbey, Enock Abokini, Enoch G., and Achigan-Dako. 2019. “Market Structure and Performance of Watermelon (Citrullus Lanatus) in Benin.†Scientific African 3:1–9.

Church, Jeffrey R., and Roger Ware. 2000. Industrial Organization : A Strategic Approach. United States of America.: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Downey, W. David, and Steven P. Erickson. 1992. Manajemen Agribisnis. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Endris, Ebrahim, Jema Haji, and Bosena Tegegne. 2020. “Analysis of Vegetables Marketing Performance in Case of Habru District, North Wollo Zone, Ethiopia.†Journal of Marketing and Consumer Research 66(March):1–9.

Geremewe, Yaregal Tilahun. 2018. “Structure, Conduct and Performance of Potato Marketing in Sekela District West Gojjam Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia.†International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences (IJRSAS) 4(12):1–9.

Haruna, Issahaku, Paul Kwame Nkegbe, and Yazidu Ustarz. 2012. “Structure , Conduct and Performance of Tomato Marketing in Ghana.†Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 3(10):156–63.

Idris, Abdulazeez, Maurice David Chinda, and Muhammad Auwal Ahmed. 2018. “Analysis of Onion Marketing Structure in Yola North Local Government Area of Adamawa State , Nigeria.†Internarional Journal of Scientific Research and Managemen (IJSRM) 06(10).

Kemendikbud. 2020. “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Daring.†Retrieved June 7, 2020 (

Lipczynski, John, John Wilson, and John Goddard. 2005. Industrial Organization: Competition, Strategy, Policy. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Nasution, Erwin, and Syahbudin. 2014. “Analisis Pemasaran Kopi Di Kabupaten Humbang Hasundutan Provinsi Sumatera Utara.†Agrica (Jurnal Agribisnis Sumatera Utara) 7 No 1:40–50.

Odufa, Egbeadumah Maryanne, Djomo Raoul Fani, and Ewung Bethel. 2016. “Structure, Conduct and Performance of Tomato Retailers in Abeokuta South, Ogun State, Nigeria.†International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences 2(4):33–39.

Phuu, Zorinah. 2016. “Analysis of Structure, Conduct and Performance of Cabbage Market in Central District of Botswana.†University of Nairobi, Nairobi.

Roy, Nendissa Doppy, Ratya Anindita, Nuhfil Hanani, and Abdul Wahib Muhaimin. 2018. “Dynamics of Degree of Beef Cattle Market Concentration In Kupang of East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.†RJOAS 6(78)(May):379–84.

Sugiyono. 2016. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Kedua. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tomek, William G., and Harry M. Kaiser. 2014. Agricultural Product Prices. fifth edit. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.




How to Cite

Gangkur, F., Anindita, R., & Toiba, H. (2022). Tomato Business Integration Conduct; Is It the Impact of Marketing Structure? (Tomato Marketing Study in Manggarai Regency, East Nusa Tenggara). HABITAT, 31(3), pp.136–143.




Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>