Supplier Performance Evaluation on Regular Raw Material Suppliers by Applying AHP and TOPSIS Approaches (Evidence from the Apple Agroindustry)

Authors

  • Afrizal Wisnu Wardana University of Brawijaya
  • Silvana Maulidah Department Socio Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Brawijaya University
  • Anisa Aprilia Department Socio Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Brawijaya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.habitat.2022.033.1.7


Keywords:

supplier, criteria, performance, evaluation, AHP

Abstract

The supplier is one of the supply chain entities that serves as a provider of raw materials, and poor supplier performance will harm the company's smooth production system. This study aims to identify supplier criteria, analyze priority weights, and evaluate supplier performance in the apple Agro-industry. Respondents in this study were business owners chosen through the judgmental sampling method. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used to test the priority weights of supplier performance criteria, while the TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method was used to test the priority weights of supplier performance priorities. The results showed that the service criteria received the highest priority weighting criteria, followed by price, quality, and delivery. Good service will positively impact integration, making it easier to achieve an effective and efficient supply chain. Meanwhile, in terms of the company's fixed supplier performance priorities, supplier 1 received the highest rating, followed by suppliers 2 and 3. Thus, supplier performance is quite good, but several things could be improved, specifically fruit size and responsiveness to supplier 3 and prices to suppliers 1 and 2.

References

Agarwal, P., Sahai, M., Mishra, V., Bag, M., & Singh, V. (2011). A review of multi-criteria decision-making techniques for supplier evaluation and selection. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2(4), 801–810.

Akbar, P. G., Henmaidi, H., & Amrina, E. (2016). Usulan Indikator Evaluasi Pemasok dalam Penetapan Bidder List: Studi Kasus Pengadaan Jasa PT. Semen Padang. Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri, 14(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.25077/josi.v14.n1.p39-54.2015

Asdidi, M. Y., Alpianto, M., & Yaqin, A. A. (2018). Evaluasi Supplier Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Dan Taguchi Loss Function. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 19(2), 178.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2019). Produksi Buah-Buahan dan Sayuran Tahunan Menurut Jenis Tanaman di Kota Batu (Ton), 2017 dan 2018. https://batukota.bps.go.id/statictable/2020/05/18/750/produksi-buah-buahan-menurut-jenis-tanaman-menurut-kecamatan-di-kota-batu-2018-dan-2019.html

Benton, W. C., Prahinski, C., & Fan, Y. (2020). The influence of supplier development programs on supplier performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 230(February), 107793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107793

Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Passaro, R. (2012). AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: Problems and perspectives. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(3), 159–172.

Chen, Y. J. (2011). Structured methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain. Information Sciences, 181(9), 1651–1670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.07.026

Coşkun, S. S., Kumru, M., & Kan, N. M. (2022). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier development through supplier evaluation based on sustainability indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 335(March 2021), 130287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130287

D’Eusanio, M., Zamagni, A., & Petti, L. (2019). Social sustainability and supply chain management: Methods and tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.323

Dwiyana, R., Sitania, F. D., & Rahayu, D. K. (2017). Pemilihan Supplier Tandan Buah Segar (TBS) Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan TOPSIS. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi IV, November, 89–98.

Ehtesham Rasi, R., Abbasi, R., & Hatami, D. (2019). The Effect of Supply Chain Agility Based on Supplier Innovation and Environmental Uncertainty. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 6(2), 94–109.

Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Operation Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management. In Pearson (12th ed.). Pearson.

Hult, G. T. M., Slater, S. F., & Ketchen, D. J. (2016). Information Processing, Knowledge Development, and Strategic Supply Chain Performance Author ( s ): G . Tomas M . Hult, David J . Ketchen Jr . and Stanley F . Slater Published by : Academy of Management Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/20159575. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 241–253.

Ilhamsyah, & Mulyani, A. (2018). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Dan Harga Terhadap Kepuasan Serta Dampaknya Pada Loyalitas Konsumen Indomaret Bagus Kuning Plaju. Jurnal Media Wahana Ekonomika, 14(4), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.31851/jmwe.v14i4.1989

Indrapriyatna, A. S., Meuthia, Y., Fatrias, D., & Gusti, M. (2011). Integrasi Taguchi Loss Function dengan Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process dalam Pemilihan Pemasok. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 13(2), 65–72. http://puslit2.petra.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/ind/article/view/18298

Ji, Y., Du, J., Han, X., Wu, X., Huang, R., Wang, S., & Liu, Z. (2020). A mixed-integer robust programming model for two-echelon inventory routing problem of perishable products. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 548, 124481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.124481

Kurniawati, D., Yuliando, H., & Widodo, K. H. (2013). Kriteria Pemilihan Pemasok Menggunakan Analytical Network Process. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 15(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.9744/jti.15.1.25-32

Lau, H., Shum, P. K. C., Nakandala, D., Fan, Y., & Lee, C. (2020). A game-theoretic decision model for organic food supplier evaluation in the global supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118536

Lis, A., Sudolska, A., & Tomanek, M. (2020). Mapping research on sustainable supply-chain management. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12103987

Maestrini, V., Luzzini, D., Caniato, F., Maccarrone, P., & Ronchi, S. (2018). The impact of supplier performance measurement systems on supplier performance: A dyadic lifecycle perspective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(11), 2040–2061. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2016-0589

Mehdikhani, R., & Valmohammadi, C. (2019). Strategic collaboration and sustainable supply chain management: The mediating role of internal and external knowledge sharing. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(5), 778–806. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2018-0166

O’Connor, N. G., Yang, Z., & Jiang, L. (2018). Challenges in gaining supply chain competitiveness: Supplier response strategies and determinants. Industrial Marketing Management, 72(April), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.04.003

Padmowati, R. de L. E. (2009). Pengukuran Index Konsistensi dalam Proses Pengambilan Keputusan Menggunakan Metode AHP. Seminar Nasional Informatika 20092, 1(5), 80–84.

Purnomo, D. E. H., & Sunardiansyah, Y. A. (2021). Implementasi Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Untuk Evaluasi Pemasok Kayu Pada Industri Furnitur. Journal Of Industrial And Systems Optimization, 4(1), 1–7.

Sánchez-Flores, R. B., Cruz-Sotelo, S. E., Ojeda-Benitez, S., & Ramírez-Barreto, M. E. (2020). Sustainable supply chain management-A literature review on emerging economies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12176972

Saragih, J., Tarigan, A., Silalahi, E. F., Wardati, J., & Pratama, I. (2020). Supply chain operational capability and supply chain operational performance: Does the supply chain management and supply chain integration matters? International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(4), 1222–1229.

Schroeder, R., & Goldstein, S. M. (2018). Operations Management in the Supply Chain. In Total Supply Chain Management (Seventh Ed). McGraw-Hill Education.

Setiawan, N., & Hendayani, R. (2015). Analisis Kinerja Pemasok pada Rantai Pasok Perusahaan Importir CV. Prisma Jaya. Sosiohumanitas, XVII(2), 193–202. file:///G:/ngajar/Penelitian & Pemas/penelitian/83-Article Text-118-2-10-20191011.pdf

Sukendar, I., Fatmawati, W., & Frinzani, A. (2021). Analisis Kinerja Supplier Berdasarkan Pendekatan Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI) Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Di PT . Idelux Furniture Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Teknik, IV(1), 11–20.

Taherdoost, H., & Brard, A. (2019). Analyzing the Process of Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 1024–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.317

Tirkolaee, E. B., Mardani, A., Dashtian, Z., Soltani, M., & Weber, G. W. (2020). A novel hybrid method using fuzzy decision making and multi-objective programming for sustainable-reliable supplier selection in two-echelon supply chain design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119517

Wulandari, E., Deliana, Y., & Fatimah, S. (2017). Kerupuk Kulit Mangga Sebagai Upaya Diversifikasi Produk Pangan. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(1), 10–13.

Yuliandono, T. Y., Chumaidiyah, E., & Aurachman, R. (2015). Evaluasi Kinerja Pemasok Gasket Dengan Menggunakan Metode FAHP Dan TOPSIS Di PT JM. EProceedings of Engineering, 2(3). http://libraryeproceeding.telkomuniversity.ac.id/index.php/engineering/article/view/700

Downloads

Published

2022-04-19 — Updated on 2022-04-21

Versions

How to Cite

Afrizal Wisnu Wardana, Silvana Maulidah, & Anisa Aprilia. (2022). Supplier Performance Evaluation on Regular Raw Material Suppliers by Applying AHP and TOPSIS Approaches (Evidence from the Apple Agroindustry). HABITAT, 33(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.habitat.2022.033.1.7 (Original work published April 19, 2022)

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)